| RSK-001 | Small firms cannot or will not pay enough for the value | SME cash constraints; management tooling perceived as nice-to-have | 4 | 4 | HIGH | Lead with revenue-linked outcomes (proposal win rate, senior hours saved); tiered entry pricing; validate willingness-to-pay before building further | Zaid | Open |
| RSK-002 | Tailoring effort does not scale — every client needs bespoke work | Each firm's processes and history differ; hand-crafted tailoring caps margin | 4 | 3 | HIGH | Build template library + AI draft-from-past-projects pipeline into the first pilot; productise what repeats after every engagement | Zaid | Open |
| RSK-003 | IP contamination from past paid engagements leaks into the product | Toolkit evolved during client work; confidential content may be embedded | 2 | 5 | HIGH | ACT-001 audit before any external demo; strip or rewrite client-specific material; fresh demo copies only | Zaid | Open |
| RSK-004 | Founder bandwidth split across NDIS, HAD Digital, Mario and this product | Four active opportunities compete for the same limited hours | 4 | 3 | HIGH | Stage-gated time-boxing; portfolio review cadence; park lower-priority bets explicitly rather than starving all | Zaid | Open |
| RSK-005 | Generic AI document tools commoditise the offering | Raw generation is getting cheap and good at draft quality | 3 | 3 | MEDIUM | Differentiate on engineering governance depth + client-corpus tailoring, not on generation alone | Zaid | Open |